Washington State Correctional Officer Practice Exam

What precedent was established by the case Graham v. Carter?

1. Strict liability in correctional practices

2. Objective reasonableness in use of force

3. Enhanced rights for inmates

4. Lowering the standards for use of force

The correct answer is: Objective reasonableness in use of force

The case of Graham v. Carter established the standard of objective reasonableness in the context of use of force by law enforcement and correctional officers. This landmark decision set a precedent that emphasizes the need to evaluate the appropriateness of force used by authorities based on a standard that considers the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene. This objective standard takes into account the circumstances surrounding each specific incident, including factors such as the severity of the threat posed by the individual, whether the individual is actively resisting arrest, and whether there is an immediate threat to the safety of officers or others. By focusing on the reasonable officer's viewpoint, the ruling aligns with the need for accountability while allowing flexibility based on the unique situations officers face. Thus, the decision reinforced the legal framework within which correctional officers must operate, ensuring that their actions in potentially volatile situations are judged against what a reasonable person would deem appropriate at that moment. This focus on objective assessment aims to protect both the rights of individuals and the safety of law enforcement personnel.